Drawing for FRENCHMAN'S RESERVE

USPTO serial 76198420

FRENCHMAN'S RESERVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FRENCHMAN'S RESERVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert F. Zielinski

ROBERT F ZIELINSKI WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR AND SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST FL 22PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Management and leasing of residential communitiesACTIVEFeb 9, 2001
037Land development, namely, planning and laying out of residential communitiesACTIVEFeb 9, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 23, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 17, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance