USPTO serial 76198502
I LEFT MY HEART IN SAN FRANCISCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3033190Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I LEFT MY HEART IN SAN FRANCISCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
SAN FRANCISCO TRAVEL ASSOCIATION
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie L.Dupree
Jamie L Dupree Futterman Dupree Dodd Crowley Maier LLP180 Sansome Street17th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras and sunglasses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely bracelets, necklaces and plastic watches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
| 018 | Key cases, key fobs, tote bags, backpacks, and umbrellas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
| 021 | Mugs and water bottles sold empty | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO TRAVEL ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named I LEFT MY HEART IN SAN FRANCISCO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |