USPTO serial 76198689
AIDENTITY MATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIDENTITY MATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSHUA A. ALDORT
JOSHUA A ALDORT CLAUSEN MILLER PC10 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603-1098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for artificial intelligence applications in toys and medical imaging devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AIdentity Matrix Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AIdentity Matrix Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AIDENTITY MATRIX
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Sep 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |