Drawing for DAYTONA

USPTO serial 76198867

DAYTONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYTONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Malcolm A. Litman

MALCOLM A LITMAN SHUGHART THOMSON & KILROY PC12 WYANDOTTE PLZ120 W 12TH STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-1917

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, namely, seats for commercial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 7, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 2, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance