USPTO serial 76198900
THERALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THERALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAINT-LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4S 2A4, CA
SAINT-LAURENT, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELMED BIOSCIENCES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THERATECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KIADIS PHARMA CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THERALUX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |