USPTO serial 76198914
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Minami-ku, Kyoto 601-8501, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | housing for television game apparatus; optical disc for use in television game apparatus; magnetic disc for use in television game apparatus; CD-ROM for use in television game apparatus; DVD for use in television game apparatus; ROM cassette for use in television game apparatus; magnetic card for use in television game apparatus; modem adapter for use in television game apparatus; controller for use in television game apparatus; electric cable for use in television game apparatus; electronic circuit recorded programs for use in television game apparatus; personal computer; video game programs for personal computer; optical disc recorded game program for personal computer; magnetic disc recorded game program for personal computer; electronic circuit recorded game program for personal computer; recorded computer program; electronic circuit recorded computer program; magnetic disc recorded computer program; magnetic tape recorded computer program; optical disc recorded computer program; portable phone; compact disc player; video disc player; video game apparatus; music recorded compact disc; music telerecorded video disc; music telerecorded video tape; adapter for connecting video game machines for use with televisions to communications devices, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, personal communication services telephones, wireless telephones and pagers; cartridges, compact discs and optical discs featuring entertainment content; musical sound recordings; visual recordings and audio-visual recordings in the nature of entertainment content; computer programs and computer software for connectivity between computer game machines/video game machines for use with televisions and communication devices, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, personal communication services telephones, wireless telephones and pagers; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely, discs; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game discs; computer game peripherals; electronic game programs; electronic game software; electronic game cartridges; electronic game discs; electronic game machines; electronic video game machines for use with a monitor or a television; interactive video game programs; interactive video game software; interactive electronic game machines; video game equipment connectable to communications devices, namely, telephones, cellular telephones, personal communication services telephones, wireless telephones, personal communication services telephones, wireless telephones and pagers; video game software; video game cartridges; video game discs; video game programs; video game machines for use with a monitor or television; video game machine accessories, namely, video game controllers and video game joysticks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |