USPTO serial 76199051
SKW METALLURGICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKW METALLURGICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40402 DUSSELDORF, DE
D-83308 TROSTBERG, DE
D-83308 Trostberg, DE
D-83308 Trostberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN INDUSTRY, NAMELY, INORGANIC BASIC CHEMICALS IN THE FORM OF CALCIUM CARBIDE AND SILICON NITRIDE; CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY, IN PARTICULAR AGENTS FOR THE DESULFURIZATION OF CRUDE IRON AND STEEL MELTS BASED ON CALCIUM CARBIDE AND/OR MAGNESIUM; NON-METAL CONTINUOUS CASTING POWDERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF STEEL | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | FILLING WIRES FOR THE TREATMENT OF REFINING OF STEEL MELTS AS WELL AS FOR INOCULATION AND FOR THE MAGNESIUM TREATMENT OF CAST IRON MELTS; CHEMICAL AND METALLURGICAL PRODUCTS FOR THE STEEL AND FOUNDRY INDUSTRY, IN PARTICULAR FERRO ALLOYS AND SPECIAL ALLOYS FOR THE PRODUCTION OR REFINING OF STEEL, AS WELL AS INOCULATION AND TREATMENT ALLOYS FOR CAST IRON MELT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEGUSSA AG
- Other trademarks owned by SKW METALLURGIE AG
- Other trademarks owned by SKW Trostberg AG
- Other trademarks owned by SKW Trostberg AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named SKW METALLURGICAL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |