Drawing for CARDIAC CARE CONNECTION

USPTO serial 76199156

CARDIAC CARE CONNECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDIAC CARE CONNECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT CARSON GODBEY

ROBERT CARSON GODBEY JACKSON GODBEY GRIFFITHSPAUAHI TWR1001 BISHOP ST STE 2300HONOLULU, HI 96813-3654

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROVIDING CARDIAC INFORMATION AND AN ILLNESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AIMED AT REDUCING THE LONG TERM HEALTH EFFECTS AND COSTS OF CARDIAC PROBLEMS THROUGH DIRECT PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN CONTACTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 7, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 2, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 26, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance