USPTO serial 76199237
FAITH POPCORN'S COCOONING COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FAITH POPCORN'S COCOONING COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS AND GILBERT1740 BROADWAY FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture, including motion chairs, ottomans and sofas | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |