USPTO serial 76199500
JASPER PARK LODGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2014
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with JASPER PARK LODGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Canadian Pacific Hotels Real Estate Corporation
Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Pacific Hotels Real Estate Corporation
CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Apolzon
Lawrence E Apolzon FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Travel and accommodation services, namely, making and taking hotel reservations for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Pacific Hotels Real Estate Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by CANADIAN RESORT HOTELS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named JASPER PARK LODGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 2, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 25, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |