Drawing for BIG IDEA INTERACTIVE

USPTO serial 76199923

BIG IDEA INTERACTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG IDEA INTERACTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Malcolm McCaleb Jr

SONJA KEITH CLASSIC MEDIA INC850 BROADWAY 6TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for entertaining and educating children in the fields of religion and moralityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2005LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jan 28, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 14, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 18, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance