USPTO serial 76199923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Malcolm McCaleb Jr
SONJA KEITH CLASSIC MEDIA INC850 BROADWAY 6TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for entertaining and educating children in the fields of religion and morality | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |