USPTO serial 76200012
THE EMPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE EMPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | travel and accommodation services, namely, making and taking hotel reservations for others not originating from a travel agency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |