Drawing for METHOD ABC

USPTO serial 76200242

METHOD ABC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METHOD ABC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clement H Luken

CLEMENT H LUKEN WOOD HERRON & EVANS2700 CAREW TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Commercial and industrial management assistance; business management supervision; business management planning; business consultation; business appraisals; market analysis; design, development and implementation of management and organizational changes; business process re-engineeringACTIVE—
042Consultation in the field of computers, computer software and computer technology; computer, software, database and communications technology design; computer software and information technology product research, development and implementationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 13, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance