USPTO serial 76200305
ENHANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENHANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
Whitby, Ontario, LIN556, CA
Other trademarks owned by Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
Whitby, Ontario, LIN556, CA
Other trademarks owned by Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Child, Jr.
JOHN S CHILD JR DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL, & SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST STE 2400PA, 19103-2307PHILIPPINESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | packaging machines and ancillary equipment namely baggers, casers and conveyors; aseptic packaging machines and ancillary equipment namely baggers, casers and conveyors; and replacement parts for liquid and asceptic packaging machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | plastic films for packaging; plastic netting for product packaging; specialty flexible plastic packaging films; and sterilized plastic packaging film | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business consulting services in the area of plastic film and packaging machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance services in the areas of plastic film for packaging and packaging machinery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Enhance Packaging Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ENHANCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |