USPTO serial 76200349
THURSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THURSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Picton, Ontario K0K 2T0, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIAN D. FIELDING
CHRISTIAN D FIELDING TEMPLEMAN MENNINGASTE 200205 DUNDAS ST P O BOX 234BELLEVILLE, ON K8N 5A2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | head lice and other ectoparasite treatment products, namely hair shampoos consisting of all-natural ingredients, specialized brushes and combs, specialized tweezers, magnifying glasses and specialized skull caps for use with the shampoos; kits comprised of various of the foregoing products; specialized clothing hanging bags designed to keep contents segregated from neighbouring clothing and prevent their infestation; flea and other animal ectoparasite treatment products, namely flea shampoos and specialized accessories; creams for treating psoriasis and other skin conditions; and videocassettes and consumer website featuring information on ectoparasite infestation and skin conditions and treatments; herbs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |