USPTO serial 76200353
FOR THE WORLD WE ALL WANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALL, MICHAEL E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOR THE WORLD WE ALL WANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN K FORD
ANN K FORD PIPER RUDNICK1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-2412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Specialty chemicals and chemical blends used as polymer additives, namely, anti-static compounds, flame retardants, anti-microbial compounds, anti-blocking compounds, anti-slip compounds, clarifiers, nucleating compounds, light stabilizers, ultraviolet light absorbers, nickel quenchers, acid scavengers, cross-linking, aging inhibitors, antioxidants, anti-ozanates, all for use in the further manufacture of fibers, films, extrusions, co-extrusions, molded articles, thermo-formed articles, and similar tangible articles, or the raw materials from which such articles are made; water treatment chemicals and chemical blends, namely, bromine, chlorine, oxidizers, pH balancers and mineral balancers; specialty refrigerants, namely, gasses used in air conditioning units; bromine-based fluid chemicals and chemical blends for use in the oil and gas industry; bromine based derivatives, namely, soil fumigants for agricultural applications; and chemical agents for flame extinguishing products, namely, fire extingushants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named FOR THE WORLD WE ALL WANT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |