USPTO serial 76200534
VISTACOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISTACOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. O'Connor
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET VIA WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES; AND PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE DELIVERY OF INTERNET APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HOSTING THE WEB SITES AND INTERNET APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND COMPUTER SITE DESIGN FOR INTERNET APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |