USPTO serial 76200557
BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3018163Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2005
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
PITTSBURGH, PA
BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
PITTSBURGH, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL L DEVER
MICHAEL L DEVER BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PROFESSIONAL CORPORATONE OXFORD CTR301 GRANT ST 20TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHARGE AND CURRENT SIGNAL MEASUREMENT AND OUTPUT DEVICES COMPRISED OF SENSORS, SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SENSORS, SEMICONDUCTORS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SIGNAL PROCESSING CIRCUITRY, RADIATION-FOCUSING LENSES, AND HOUSINGS TO MEASURE ACCELERATION AND RADIATION, NAMELY, INFRARED, OPTICAL AND X-RAY FOCAL PLANE ARRAYS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OnGuard Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OnGuard Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BRIDGE SEMICONDUCTOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |