USPTO serial 76200586
RVSI READY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RVSI READY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morris I. Pollack
MORRIS I POLLACK19 EBERHARDT RDE HANOVER, NJ 07936UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EQUIPMENT, COMPONENTS, DEVICES, PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS THEREOF FOR ELECTRONIC, SEMI-CONDUCTOR, PHARMACEUTICAL, PACKAGE, BIOTECH, AEROSPACE AND AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES; NAMELY EQUIPMENT, DEVICES AND SYSTEMS THEREOF FOR VISION AND AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION FOR WAFERS, ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, CIRCUITS, AND PC BOARDS, PACKAGES, DEVICE LEADS, GRID ARRAYS, BALL PLACEMENT, TAPE AND REEL COMPONENT PROCESSING, IMAGING, TRAY TO TAPE, 1-D AND 2-D DATA COLLECTION AND BAR-CODE AND MATRIX CODE IMAGING, READING, AND DECODING AS WELL AS COMPONENTS, PROGRAMS AND SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE THEREFORE-ALL | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING DESIGN, OPERATION AND SERVICING OF SAME | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |