USPTO serial 76200593
RAYMARINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2005
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RAYMARINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEER, BE
Portsmouth, Hampshire, GB
Thousand Oaks, CA
WILSONVILLE, OR
PORTSMOUTH, HAMPSHIRE PO3 5TD, GB
Southampton, Hampshire SO14 2TP, GB
Southampton, Hampshire SO14 2TP, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Zoetewey
David Zoetewey Teledyne Technologies Incorporated1049 Camino Dos RiosThousand Oaks, CA 91360United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and electrical apparatus and equipment for marine and nautical use, namely-- radar; sonar; fishfinders; depthfinders; weather stations consisting of transducers, computer hardware and software that measure speed, wind speed and direction, temperature, and compass direction; transducers that measure distance, trip logs, vehicle steering, rudder angle and trim; electronic automatic controls (autopilots) for use in adjusting, steering and keeping courses; chartplotters; transceivers, transmitters, and antennas for transmitting and receiving data, voice, Internet and video information; global positioning system (gps) consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers and network interface devices; radios; loud-hailers; broadband wireless communication equipment consisting of transceivers, transmitters, receivers, antennae, amplifiers, and frequency converters | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer consultancy services; software programming services; software development services; hosting computer software applications for others; providing online tracking, locating and monitoring of maritime vessels via a global computer network; providing information on weather, water depths, cartography, satellite images of shore line, water temperatures and identification of ocean live via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Jan 29, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLIR BELGIUM BVBA
- Other trademarks owned by RAYMARINE HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TELEDYNE FLIR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FLIR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RAYMARINE HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Bondco 838 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Bondco 838 Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RAYMARINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |