USPTO serial 76200681
PRO-LASER LENS QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO-LASER LENS QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rosh-Ha'ayin 48017, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shifra N. Malina
SHIFRA N MALINA SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP875 3RD AVE 24TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Optical devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments and the systems formed therefrom, in particular, for producing, working and maintaining glasses, lenses and other vision aids of all types, Medical-technical devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments and systems formed therefrom for ophthalmology, in particular, for diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of eye diseases and for the determination of eye and vision characteristics, Software for producing and operating the devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments and systems listed in the foregoing classes, Furniture for equipping laboratories, doctors' offices, and clinics as pieces of equipment and for medical and medical-technical purposes; Working and maintaining of visual aids of all types; Maintenance, repair, servicing, modernization and development of devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments, systems and software listed in the foregoing classes; Training pertaining to the function and operation of devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments, systems, software listed in the foregoing classes; Organizational, technical and financial consultation for equipping laboratories, doctors' offices, clinics, and planning of such equipping; Telecommunication, in particular, teletransmission of data in the field of optics and ophthalmology; Development of programs for data processing, in particular, software for devices, apparatuses, machines, instruments and systems listed in the foregoing classes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |