Drawing for FIVE NINES ROUTING

USPTO serial 76200980

FIVE NINES ROUTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIVE NINES ROUTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karin Segall

KARIN SEGALL DARBY AND DARBY805 3RD AVE FL 26NEW YORK, NY 10022-7557UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, computer network switches, routers for telecommunications service providers, routers for optical networks, internet protocol and carrier class based routersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance