Drawing for SCAPER

USPTO serial 76201015

SCAPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCAPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOUND RECORDINGS, VIDEO RECORDINGS AND DVDS ALL FEATURING SCIENCE FICTION AND LIVE ACTION; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES, VIRTUAL REALITY GAMES COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAMES; AND DOWNLOADABLE SOUND RECORDINGS, VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING SCIENCE FICTION AND LIVE ACTION, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES, VIRTUAL REALITY GAMES COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAMESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, FAN CLUB SERVICES; OPERATING A FAN SITE OVER THE INTERNET; TELEVISION PROGRAMS FEATURING SCIENCE FICTION AND LIVE ACTIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance