USPTO serial 76201254
CAPTAIN MET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPTAIN MET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game software; computer game programs; video computer game programs; game discs and circuit boards containing game programs for use with cellular phones, hand-held or arcade video game machines with built-in screens; downloadable video game software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sega
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Overworks
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sega
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Overworks
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sega
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Overworks
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Sega
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Overworks
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CAPTAIN MET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |