USPTO serial 76201328
G GRAVITY GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G GRAVITY GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
STAMFORD, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH K. SQUIERS
DAVID M SILVERMAN ESQ COLE, RAYWID & BRAVERMAN LLP1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL BICYCLE LOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | RADIOS AND COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; BICYCLE HELMETS; SPEEDOMETERS FOR BICYCLES; AND BICYCLE PROTECTIVE GEAR, NAMELY, PROTECTIVE EYEWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | LIGHTS FOR BICYCLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | BICYCLES; BICYCLE TIRE PUMPS; BASKETS ADAPTED FOR BICYCLES; BICYCLE TIRES AND TUBES; BICYCLE PEDALS AND FOOT PEGS; BICYCLE HANDLEBAR GRIPS; BICYCLE SEATS; CARRYING BAGS MADE FOR USE WITH BICYCLES; AND BAGS FOR CARRYING BICYCLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | PROTECTIVE GEAR, NAMELY GLOVES FOR BICYCLE RIDING, ELBOW PADS AND KNEE PADS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMAP USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA SPECIALTY GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIMEDIA SPECIALTY GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OUTDOOR LIFE NETWORK, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named G GRAVITY GAMES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |