Drawing for MATPLAN

USPTO serial 76201404

MATPLAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MATPLAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART J. BELLUS

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, CONSUMER RELATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION RELATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR PLANNING, ANALYSIS, CONSOLIDATION, AND REPORTING, ALL FOR ENTERPRISE PLANNING, ANALYSIS, CONSOLIDATION AND REPORTINGACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER AND PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, JOURNALS, NEWSLETTERS, AND MAGAZINES ABOUT COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; MANUALS ABOUT COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR INTELLIGENT APPLICATIONS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESSACTIVE—
037COMPUTER HARDWARE INSTALLATIONS, REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATING THERETOACTIVE—
041COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE USER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICESACTIVE—
042PROGRAMMING AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING WITH RESPECT TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION, REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND CONSULTATION RELATING THERETOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Apr 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance