USPTO serial 76201584
ODOR-EATERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ODOR-EATERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
White Plains, NY
White Plains, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert R Caliri
ROBERT R CALIRI EMRICH & DITHMAR LLC125 S WACKER DR STE 2080CHICAGO, IL 60606-4401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Deodorant powders and sprays for use on cats and dogs, and on beds and bedding for cats and dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Disposable training pads with deodorizing properties for use in cat litter pans, dog litter pans, dog houses and dog kennels | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cat litter pans and dog litter pans consisting in part of dispensing units for deodorizers | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Cat and dog litter with deodorizing properties; and deodorizers and deodorizing preparations sold as components of cat and dog litter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Combe Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Combe Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ODOR-EATERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |