USPTO serial 76201759
STURGIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STURGIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Sneed
Jason M. Sneed SNEED PLLC610 Jetton St.Suite 120-107Davidson, NC 28036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Towels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named STURGIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | TTBN | CASE ASSIGNED TO TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |