USPTO serial 76201760
BLACK HILLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLACK HILLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Sneed
Jason M. Sneed SNEED PLLC610 Jetton St.Suite 120-107Davidson, NC 28036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Towels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STURGIS MOTORCYCLE RALLY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks owned by Sturgis Area Chamber of Commerce
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named BLACK HILLS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |