USPTO serial 76202042
LITESTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITESTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd C. Hixon
TODD C HIXON INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS INC1 S CHURCH AVE STE 200P O BOX 711TUCSON, AZ 85702-0711Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | THIN FILM BATTERY FOR USE IN ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS INCLUDING MICROELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION TAGS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, COMPUTER MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER PROCESS MEMORIES INCLUDING COMPUTER S-RAM CHIPS, AND SEMICONDUCTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LITESTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |