USPTO serial 76202047
INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd C. Hixon
TODD C HIXON INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS INC1 S CHURCH AVE STE 200P O BOX 711TUCSON, AZ 85702-0711Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and scientific apparatus including microelectronic devices, namely radio frequency identification tags, integrated circuits, computer memory devices, namely computer S-RAM chips, and semiconductors using then film battery | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Infinite Power Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Infinite Power Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INFINITE POWER SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |