USPTO serial 76202060
INLAND EMPIRE DRIVELINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INLAND EMPIRE DRIVELINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUBLAS B. JACOBS
DOUBLAS B. JACOBS JACOBS, ANDERSON, POTTER & CHAPLIN, LLP20 Independence CircleCHICO, CA 95973UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drive shafts, transmission yokes and pinion yokes for land vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Inland Empire Drive Line Service, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named INLAND EMPIRE DRIVELINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |