Drawing for FIESTA CLUB

USPTO serial 76202078

FIESTA CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIESTA CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia S. Padierna-Peralta

JULIA S PADIERNA-PERALTA JULIA S PADIERNA PERALTA1000 PAPER MILL CT NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-3619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, liqueurs, distilled liquors, prepared alcoholic cocktails, cordials, alcoholic punch, and alcoholic egg nog beverageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 22, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 22, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 30, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance