USPTO serial 76202271
INL INSTITUTE FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INL INSTITUTE FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas W. Chamas
DOUGLAS W CHAMAS JACKSON & CAMPBELL, PC1120 20TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conduct educational research regarding implementation of nursing leadership programs; develop educational manuals, programs and modules to be used for implementation of nursing leadership programs; arrange and conduct educational conferences and seminars regarding nursing leadership programs; provide instruction and teaching regarding nursing leadership | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1998 |
| 042 | Research and consultation in the field of nursing leadership and development of nursing leadership programs and modules | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |