Drawing for ILLINOIS TRIAL REPORTER

USPTO serial 76202290

ILLINOIS TRIAL REPORTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILLINOIS TRIAL REPORTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERTA JACOBS MEADWAY

ROBERTA JACOBS MEADWAY COMMERCEAKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLP2005 MARKET ST FL 22PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed legal publications, namely, newspapers and magazines pertaining to the legal fieldACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing on-line newspapers and magazines in the field of law; providing on-line information services in the field of lawACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 26, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance