USPTO serial 76202336
RESEARCHWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESEARCHWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BILLERICA, MA
Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward E Vassallo
EDWARD E VASSALLO FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL PLANNING, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION; INVESTMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT AND TRADING ADVICE; CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT AND TRADING CONSULTATION; DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION EFFECTIVENESS AND TRADING EXECUTION QUALITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by B.D. of Nevada, Limited Partnership
- Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by INSTINET TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named RESEARCHWORKS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |