Drawing for MI

USPTO serial 76202340

MI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223578Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2007
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KEITH E. DANISH

KEITH E. DANISH HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Office paper, namely, writing paper, printed publications, namely, magazines on intellectual property; photographs; letter paper; envelopes; color pens; playing cards; books on strategy for intellectual property, notebooks; catalogues in the field of databases for intellectual property; calendars; greeting cards; trading cards; stickers; newsletters on domain names and intellectual propertySECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
035Advertising services, namely, professional business consultancy; marketing research; commercial information agencies; personnel placement; document reproduction; shorthand; stenography; stenography transcription; document and magnetic-tape filing; import-export clearance agencies; operation of computer, typewriter, fax, copying machine, and document handling and processing machines, for others; promotion of seminars for intellectual property; rental of advertising space; intellectual property management; copyright management; intellectual property agenciesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
042Preparing intellectual property contracts for others; research and investigation for intellectual property; search services for patents, utility models, designs, trademarks; providing information for intellectual property; providing information for judicial precedent; providing information for intellectual property laws and treaties; legal services and advice for intellectual property; computer database services for intellectual property; language translation; foreign language interpretation; computer programming for others, maintenance of computer software; providing information, search services, and procedures for obtaining domain names on a global computer network; searching for availability of domain names; leasing access time to a computer database; providing information of worldwide domain names; registration of domain names on the InternetSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 27, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 26, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 14, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 29, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 13, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jun 9, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jun 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 5, 2006ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 28, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2006ADBS1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED—
Apr 20, 2006PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Feb 24, 2006PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Aug 23, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 10, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance