USPTO serial 76202589
CONDAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONDAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
10559 Berlin, DE
10559 Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Friedrich Kueffner
C. Robert Rhodes Lucas & Mercanti LLp475 Park Avenue SouthNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for operating data communications equipment for telecommunications services; computer hardware and software for testing radio networks; blank computer diskettes and prerecorded diskettes containing images, sound files, and computer programs in the field of communication networks and telecommunication services; data processing equipment and computers, namely equipment for testing, checking, control, measuring and adjustment of telecommunications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of telecommunications networks, apparatus, and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Telecommunications consulting, namely advising others about choosing radio services for mobile data communications; engineering services for software and hardware development; technical consultation in the field of software product development; technical consultation for the development of information systems data bases for others; computer data protocol conversion for others; rental of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |