USPTO serial 76202595
2 GRRRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 2 GRRRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Therese A. Hendricks
THERESE A HENDRICKS FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, a continuing children's show distributed over television satellite, audio and video media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RIETVELD, LISA
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE, TRILBY
- Other trademarks owned by 2 GRRRLS, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 2 GRRRLS, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named 2 GRRRLS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |