Drawing for OPENET SIMPLIFYING YOUR SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76202596

OPENET SIMPLIFYING YOUR SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OPENET SIMPLIFYING YOUR SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6307UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS BY SELECTING THIRD-PARTY COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COORDINATE, CONFIGURE AND INTEGRATE THEM SO THEY ARE COMPATIBLE FOR INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE AND LAW FIRMS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING, MAINTAINING, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELDS OF INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE AND LAW FIRMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES NAMELY TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS FOR INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE AND LAW FIRMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS FOR INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE AND LAW FIRMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NAMELY, MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR CLIENTS, NAMELY, INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE AND LAW FIRMSACTIVEFeb 2, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance