USPTO serial 76202718
CRESCENDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3093495Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRESCENDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut, CA
Walnut, CA
Walnut, CA
Walnut, CA
Walnut, CA
Walnut, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Itri
Robert J. Itri Milligan Lawless PC5050 N. 40th St., Suite 200Phoenix, AZ 85018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate time-sharing; vacation real estate time-sharing, leasing of real property, specifically, leasing vacation homes and tourist homes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2005 |
| 037 | Land development services, namely, planning and laying out of residential communities; real estate development; planning and laying out of recreational facilities, social facilities, community facilities, meeting centers; construction services, namely, construction of residential buildings and related facilities, namely, construction of recreational, social, and community facilities and meeting centers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2005 |
| 038 | Providing multi-user access to a global computer information network to residential communities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2005 |
| 041 | Providing facilities for recreational activities; golf club services; golf courses; providing sport facilities, namely, facilities for tennis and swimming; recreational services in the nature of golf, walking trails, arts and crafts, swimming, tennis, and fitness club services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 16, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Shea Homes, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CRESCENDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |