USPTO serial 76202729
GRL>LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRL>LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN E OTTAVIANI
JOHN E OTTAVIANI EDWARDS& ANGELL, LLP101 FEDERAL ST PO BOX 9169BOSTON, MA 02209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; HEALTH AND BEAUTY AIDS, NAMELY, SOAPS, SHAMPOO, PERFUMES, LOTIONS, NAMELY, SKIN, HAIR, AFTER-SUN, AND SHAVING LOTIONS; NAIL POLISH AND NAIL POLISH REMOVER; LIPSTICK, ROUGE, EYE LINER AND MASCARA; COTTON STICKS AND BUFFS FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES; COTTON SWAB EYE MAKEUP APPLICATORS; ARTIFICIAL EYE LASHES AND FALSE NAILS; FACE AND BODY SOAPS; GEL CREAM USED FOR SHAVING AND GEL CREAM FOR THE HAIR; SHAVING FOAM; PERFUME AND COLOGNE; ROOM FRAGRANCES; HAIR SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERS; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SKIN LOTION AND SKIN CLEANSER; AND NON-MEDICATED FOOT POWDER | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | JEWELRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY BARRETTES, TIES AND RIBBONS, HAIR BAND, HAIR COMBS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | SNACK FOOD, NAMELY FRUIT BASED SNACK FOOD, POTATO BASED SNACK FOOD AND SOY-BASED SNACK FOODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | GRANOLA-BASED SNACK FOODS, PUFFED CORN SNACK FOODS, RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS, WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS, CRACKERS, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD, SNACK FOOD CHEESE BALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | SOFT DRINKS, NAMELY, CARBONATED, NON-CARBONATED AND LOW-CALORIE BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CVS VANGUARD, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GRL>LAB
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |