USPTO serial 76202749
DIGIPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGIPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAKE BLUFF, IL
LAKE BLUFF, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF LTD1001 G ST NW STE 1100 WWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | GRINDER AND POLISHER MACHINES AND PARTS THEREFOR USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SAMPLES OF METAL, ROCK, PLASTICS, CERAMICS AND GLASS FOR MICROSTRUCTURAL EVALUATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |