USPTO serial 76203007
WATER TREK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATER TREK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Nitkin
850 BOYLSTON ST #424CHESTNUT HILL, MA 02467-2402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | plastic conduits for home plumbing use, namely, conduits installed in subfloors designed to keep basements dry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |