USPTO serial 76203067
ZY-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3291251Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZY-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stafford, TX
Zy-Tech Global Industries, Inc.
Stafford, TX
Zy-Tech Global Industries, Inc.
Stafford, TX
Stafford, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | MANUALLY OPERATED METAL VALVES, FLANGES, PIPE AND PIPE FITTINGS THEREFOR, NAMELY, MULTITURN AND QUARTERTURN VALVES, VALVES FOR USE IN METAL PIPING SYSTEMS, TUBES AND GEAR BOXES ALL MADE OF METAL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zidell Valve Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Zy-Tech Global Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zy-Tech Global Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Zidell Valve Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named ZY-TECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |