USPTO serial 76203166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN R FINK,
STEVEN R FINK ATTORNEY AT LAWSTE 91688 GREENWICH STNEW YORK, NY 10006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Online retail store services, retail store services, mail order catalog services, all in the field of clothing, clothing accessories, namely, women's, men's, boys and girls wearing apparel, namely, shirts, t-shirts, jump suits, tank tops, blouses, jackets, bathing suits, beach and swimming cover-ups, pants, dresses, shorts, walking shorts, skirts, jeans, gloves, suits, sports jackets, blazers, dinner jackets, belts, socks, stockings, tights, hats, outerwear, namely, jackets, coats and vests, sweaters, fur coats, fur trimmed coats, shearling coats, shearling jackets, rainwear, raincoats, capes, ponchos, shoes, boots, slippers, tennis and golf dresses, tennis and golf shorts, warm-up suits, scarves, shawls, ties and women's and girl's intimate apparel, sleepwear and loungewear, bodywear, namely, foundations, lingerie, namely, merry widows, bras, girdles, garter belts, one piece bra and girdle, corselets, body stockings, control briefs, control hipsters, control bikinis, bra slips, bra top camisoles, waist cinchers, bustiers, merry widows, camisettes, leotards and unitards, daywear, namely, culottes, bikinis, hipsters, maternity slips, panty slips, princess slips, shadow panel slips, strapless slips, suite slips, tailored slips, half-slips, petti-slips, bra-slips, chemises, teddies camisoles, bra top camisoles, bralettes, tap pants, and pettipants, daywear, loungewear, sleepwear and bodywear, namely, nightgowns, toga nightgowns, night shirts, pajamas, shortie pajamas, baby doll pajamas, T-shirt pajamas, French maid sleepers, harem pajamas, hostess culottes, lounging pajamas, rompers, sleep shorts, peignoirs, bed jackets, caftans, jumpsuits, teddies, bathrobes, dressing gowns, kimonos, housecoats, beach togas, beach wrap-ups, breakfast coats, brunch coats, hooded bathrobes, dusters, hostess robes, kabuki robes, lounging robes and monk's robes, bra tops, crop tops and leggings, excluding women's hosiery, and also featuring housewares, glassware, tableware, flatware, indoor and outdoor furniture, pillows, slipcovers, rugs, lamps and lighting fixtures, curtains, curtain rods, table linens, bed linens, bath linens, bath oils, skin care lotions and oils, fragrance oils, potpourri, candle holders, picture frames, mirrors, vases, baskets made of wicker, interior decorating books, interior wall and furniture paint, wall coverings, window coverings, window shades, fabric, namely, curtain fabric, upholstery fabric, fabric made of cotton and fabric made of gauze, sunglasses, jewelry, clocks, pre-recorded compact discs, personal care products, household products for dining, bed and bath, housewares and glass, paper goods, leather goods, luggage and bags; gift registry services, providing retail information online and by telephone about products and services featured in the online retail store and mail order catalog of others | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |