Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76203194?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76203194. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns RAPIDPARTSMART?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76203194, the listed owner(s) include: SCIENTECH, LLC, Scientech, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76203194?

Serial number 76203194 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark RAPIDPARTSMART. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of RAPIDPARTSMART?

RAPIDPARTSMART (76203194) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover RAPIDPARTSMART?

The public record lists International Classes: 035. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 76203194

RAPIDPARTSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jan 30, 2001
Status date: Aug 20, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPIDPARTSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

SCIENTECH, LLC
IDAHO FALLS, ID
Other trademarks owned by SCIENTECH, LLC
Scientech, Inc.
Gaithersburg, MD
Other trademarks owned by Scientech, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY D. LUECK

JEANETTE S ZIMMER SCHIFF HARDIN LLPPO BOX 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
035	PROVIDING AN ON-LINE MARKETPLACE FOR SELLERS AND PURCHASERS OF SURPLUS ELECTRIC UTILITY PARTS, NAMELY, PROVIDING A SERVICES FOR MEMBER SHARING OF INFORMATION ON SOLUTIONS AND NEW PROCUREMENT SOURCES FOR HARD-TO-FIND AND OUT-OF-PRODUCTION COMPONENTS AND FEATURING INVENTORY DATA POOLING FOR COLLABORATIVE INVENTORY MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF URGENT PARTS NEEDS OF ELECTRIC UTILITIES; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGING SERVICES, NAMELY, MANAGING A DATABASE OF ELECTRIC UTILITY SPARE PARTS INVENTORY DATA; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE OF UTILITY SURPLUS PARTS FOR SALE, ALL OF WHICH ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY DISPLAYED AND ACCESSIBLE; PROVIDING SUPPLY CHAIN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ACTING AS A NAVIGATOR FOR SUPPLY CHAIN NETWORKS AND FIRM'S PREFERRED NET MARKETS TO INTEGRATE WITH E-COMMERCE APPLICATIONS AND PROMOTION OF DISCIPLINED PURCHASE DECISIONS USING DATABASES TO ENSURE THAT PROCUREMENT STAFFS CONSISTENTLY PURCHASE FROM INTERNAL INVENTORY, EXTERNAL INVENTORIES AND PREFERRED SUPPLIER CATALOGS	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 21, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 20, 2007	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 20, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 6, 2007	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Feb 6, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jan 16, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 16, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jan 16, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jul 15, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 22, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 22, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
May 22, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Nov 21, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2005	UNDN	UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN	—
May 16, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2005	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Nov 12, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 19, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 3, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 31, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Aug 19, 2004	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Sep 17, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 5, 2002	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 30, 2002	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Dec 17, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 14, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 14, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—