USPTO serial 76203209
FLAT VUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAT VUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Walton Beach, FL
Fort Walton Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Loffler
P O BOX 1001NICEVILLE, FL 32588-1001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Flat video display devices in the nature of monitors, computer displays, laptop computers, notebook computers, televisions, cellular phones, beepers, digital assistants, portable Internet devices, medical test equipment, namely MRI monitoring screens, computer tomography monitoring screens, and interaoperative monitoring screens for endoscopy and stereotactic surgical procedures, and electronic advertising displays | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |