Drawing for FLATV

USPTO serial 76203213

FLATV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLATV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter Loffler

PO BOX 1001NICEVILLE, FL 32588-1001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Flat video display devices in the nature of monitors, computer displays, televisions, digital assistants, portable Internet devices, and electronic advertising displaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 17, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance