USPTO serial 76203230
Z.O.E.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Z.O.E.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes, namely, playing cards, trading cards, posters; printed matter, namely, video game strategy books and video game strategy booklets; animation books and animation booklets; stationery, loose-leaf binders, plastic wrap for wrapping or packaging, calendars, document files, plastic film for wrapping | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, action figures, stand alone electronic amusement video game machine adapted for use with liquid crystal displays; stand alone video game machines adapted for use with dot matrix crystal displays; automatic and coin-operated stand alone video game amusement machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |